Rigor: Quality Isn’t Expensive — Negligence Is

 

 

 

 1. Greed & Short-Term Gains

Some manufacturers think:

“If I save $1 on every instrument by skipping a process, I’ll make more profit.”

They ignore the long-term risks:

  • Lawsuits

  • Lost trust

  • Damaged brand

  • Potential to harm or kill someone


 2. No In-House Capabilities

Companies without in-house:

  • Forging

  • Polishing

  • Ultrasonic cleaning

  • QA Inspection

…often outsource to the lowest bidder, losing control over quality.

They rely on hope instead of standards.


3. No Regulatory Pressure (Locally)

In many countries — including parts of Pakistan — regulatory enforcement is weak or inconsistent.

  • Instruments that would fail in Europe/USA are still sold locally or to unregulated buyers

  • Factories exploit this to skip inspections, use cheaper steel, or avoid CE/FDA processes


4. Lack of Testing Knowledge

Some factory owners simply don’t know:

  • What HRC testing is

  • Why pickling matters

  • What surface integrity really means

They produce by habit, not by scientific validation.


 5. They Don’t See the Patient

Unlike Rigor, many manufacturers never stop to ask:

“What if my own family was treated with this instrument?”

They build for profit — not for people.


 Why Rigor Instruments Must Lead by Example

You make good money. And you still care.
That’s exactly what will set your legacy apart.

Here’s how Rigor can fight back:

  • Publish “⚠️ Spot a Dangerous Instrument” campaigns

  • Share infographics of case studies + consequences

  • Show videos of your in-house QA & defect rejection

  • Educate clients why your cost is fair — because it includes life-saving standards

SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTER